A recent case from 2020 teaches us a valuable lesson on separate property and prenups. William and Lora Lou were married in 1996. The day before their wedding, they signed a prenup. The prenup declared which assets were to be considered separate property. Remember, separate property means it will not be divided in the divorce. William listed several assets in the prenup which were to remain separate. Among these assets were some retirement accounts with a value of $97,477. The prenup specifically stated that all assets separately owned and in each party’s name at the time of marriage should remain that party’s separate assets and not be subject to division upon divorce.
Fast forward 20 years, and William files for divorce. He files for divorce thinking that his retirement accounts are safe and sound from the property division. Unfortunately, he’s sorely mistaken. His beloved retirement account of $97,477 grew to a whopping $994,523 by 2016. The question became: did the increase in value from $97k to $994k get divided as marital property, or did the increase in value remain separate property, not subject to division?
Drum roll… the ~$900,000 difference was subject to property division because William did not specifically state that the increase in value would also remain his separate property. So, William was able to keep the $97,477, but the court was able to divide up the rest ($897,046) between the two. Some of the judges in this district disagreed with this court’s decision and said it shouldn’t be divided. Regardless of the court’s disagreement, just to be safe, you should always include any increase in value, specifically in the prenup, to avoid the same situation William found himself in.
Thompson v. Wolfram, 162 N.E.3d 498, 506 (Ind. App. 2020), reh’g denied (Feb. 22, 2021)