Mr. and Mrs. Binek, both with children from previous marriages, decided to get married (this was back in the 80s). Mr. Binek, significantly wealthier, presented Mrs. Binek with a prenup just two days before their wedding. He insisted she sign it or the marriage was off. Although Mrs. Binek didn’t have a lawyer, she signed.
Years later, when they divorced and their financial situations had changed, Mrs. Binek challenged the prenup’s validity. She claimed she signed under pressure, lacked legal counsel, and wasn’t fully informed about her husband’s finances.
The court disagreed. They found Mrs. Binek had the chance to get a lawyer but chose not to, understood the agreement, and signed willingly. The short notice before the wedding wasn’t enough to invalidate it.
Regarding finances, despite no detailed financial disclosure, the prenup stated both parties were aware of each other’s assets. Plus, Mrs. Binek’s testimony showed she had a basic understanding of Mr. Binek’s financial situation, making it sufficient disclosure in the court’s eyes.
Moral of the story? You can’t just get out of a prenup because you don’t like the outcome years later. Even if you signed the prenup a few days before, didn’t have an attorney or detailed financial disclosure, it generally (without more) may not be enough to invalidate the agreement.