The wife claimed the prenup she signed was invalid because she was pressured into signing it, saying she felt she had no choice because she wanted to marry to legitimize her daughter, and the husband said he wouldn’t marry her without it. She argued it was written by the husband himself and signed too close to the wedding. She also argued he basically forced her to sign it because he wouldn’t marry her without one.
However, the court disagreed with the wife and ruled that the prenup was valid. Here’s why:
– Just because the husband wrote the agreement himself doesn’t make it unfair. Especially since the wife had her own lawyer look it over.
– The short time between signing the prenup and the wedding doesn’t automatically mean pressure. Signing the agreement a few days before the wedding is not enough, on its own, to prove that the husband was being forceful or manipulative.
– The husband saying he wouldn’t marry without a prenup isn’t considered forceful enough to invalidate it. This doesn’t count as forcing someone into something through undue influence, coercion, or overreaching.
So, even though the wife felt pressured, the agreement was signed several days before the wedding, and the husband drafted the agreement himself; the court didn’t find enough evidence to say the prenuptial agreement was invalid.
Lebeck v. Lebeck, 881 P.2d 727, 734 (N.M. App. 1994)