This North Carolina case involved a couple who entered into a prenup 5 days before their marriage in 1994. The agreement had a clause that stated the following:
- The couple plans to live in their Greensboro house, which the husband currently owns.
- Soon after they get married, the husband will transfer half ownership of the house to the wife. They will then both own an equal, undivided share of the house.
- The wife will have the right to continue living in the house even after the husband’s death, for as long as she wants, as long as she considers it her home.
After their separation in 1996, the husband initiated a divorce action to have the property split up, and the wife counterclaimed, seeking enforcement of the prenuptial agreement that the husband had allegedly breached. The wife argued that the agreement was valid and enforceable. The husband, on the other hand, presented evidence suggesting a potential oral agreement amending the terms of the prenup.
The result? The prenuptial agreement was found to be valid and enforceable by the higher court. They reasoned that any changes to a prenuptial agreement must be in writing and signed, which didn’t occur in this case.
Huntley v. Huntley, 538 S.E.2d 239, 242 (2000)